|
BEING:
|
Contents |
Being-Intro | Part1 |
Part2 | Part3 |
Part4 | Part6
| end
| Checklists |
| CHOICE | LIGHTS |
LIBERTY | Feedback |
BEING:
Beyond the Soul
by L.
Rae Lake
PART 5.
The Illusory Dualism of Soul and Personality
(Hierarchical Consciousness of Individuality)
|
"When one of you falls
down he falls for those behind him, a caution against the stumbling stone. Ay, and he
falls for those ahead of him, who though faster and surer of foot,
yet removed not the
stumbling stone".
Kahlil Gibran37
|
SEEING
THROUGH ILLUSION
In our better moments,
we see that the ascending hierarchy of spiritual abstraction with which we now
identify is a hierarchy of degrees of clarity as to the various illusions which jumble and
distort our thoughts and attitudes. But perhaps none is so serious as the apparent
separation of soul and personality which is a wildly successful planetary illusion
dependent upon our being intellectually deceived by misleading images and
misinterpretations. Our acceptance of exclusive intelligence (personality) and inclusive
intelligence (soul) as a single unit of course in no way precludes an intensive
exploration of either personality or soul alone.
Dr. Jonas Salk pointed out that "A
hierarchy will always exist of the immature, the not-yet-wise and the unwise, as well as
those who possess the natural capacity to develop and express practical wisdom".38
To reject our exclusive intelligence is effectively to reject our interconnecting mass
awareness because such rejection affects our attitude towards ourselves and others. The
struggle between the wise and the unwise continues within our own mind (where illusion
exists) until we stop rejecting our personality, our logical mind, our discriminating,
exclusive intelligenceour humanity.
Even the unwise who do not actively seek the soul
find it sooner or later nonetheless as human elements within the will of the synthetic
intelligence of the monadic Mind. However, only as we actively use inclusive intelligence
(the middle principle of mind) is our awareness transformed into a compassionate buffering
interface relating the isolated human intellect with the oneness of monadic Being.
Strictly speaking, we then share but are no longer bound by exclusive intelligence yet for
long after that we struggle with an illusory sense of isolation and illusory restrictions,
reaping conflict and disappointment as we discount rather than uplift our personality
while wondering whats wrong with other people. Whether we approve of
their actions or not, or think them cruel or foolish, all human beings are born
soul-infused initiates of all degrees by the blessing of universal
consciousness. We remain subject to the descending hierarchy of stimulation of
strictly human, information-oriented intelligence and unaware of our salvation, and often
continue to take appearances seriously by buying into collective illusions associated with
human aspiration. Fortunately, when we see through any illusion the spell loses its power
to mislead.
OF
GODS AND ANGELS
In any assumed separation of personality and soul,
both misleading images and misinterpretation wreak spiritual havoc. A small but persistent
example of a misleading image is the halo, suggesting that those with a nimbus are somehow
more sacred than other people. We see stained-glass images and paintings of people
sporting coronas, ethereal crowns, rings of light, luminosity or radiance depicting
saintly or spiritual individuals.
Prior to the Bible, gods and goddesses as
personifications or exemplars of various qualities were depicted wearing aura enhancing
golden rings around their heads suggesting sacred or godly awareness or powers. Today such
images continue to promote the separative notion that certain people are somehow
superior, i.e., they are souls, we are personalities.
Our fondness for angels, romantic fragments of our
not entirely forgotten past, upholds another powerfully divisive image. These luxuriously
winged elements of a symbolic celestial hierarchy are enjoying a resurgence in popularity
unparalleled since Victorian times. Angel (angello in Greek) means simply
messenger or mediator, referring to consciousness,
called the Mercury or
Christ principle.
The spiritual problem is that angels with wings are exclusive symbols for
inclusive intelligence and as such are misleading as to the relating nature of the mediating
interface between God and man, monad and personality, higher and lower mindthat
middle principle of Mind of which both the heart center and the one soul are inclusive
symbols.
|
Symbolic Fragments of Reality |
| exclusive
intelligence |
inclusive
intelligence |
synthetic
intelligence |
| separate
personalities |
angels/souls/guides |
wholeness/oneness |
| mother/madonna/goddess |
son/babe
in Christ/holy infant |
father/monad/god |
|
Remember, the middle principle is essentially the
relationship between lower and higher. This is as true today as when Mary's first
subjective contact with her higher consciousness was described as a visitation by an
angel.
"And when she saw
him, she was troubled at his saying, and cast in her mind what manner of
salutation this should be".39
Sensed emotionally but
mentally unrecognized as elements of our own inclusive consciousness, these charmingly
sentimental images represent fragments of unintegrated intelligence. So it may be good news that
such angelic depictions of the soul have become mostly a fashion statement as images of
cherubic babies and serene women with wings adorn plaques and chocolates, ride on lapels
and peer from candlesticks. Two thousand years ago, humanity needed angels as a reminder
to 'look up' to the presence of the soul but today our general awareness of consciousness is quite
improved.
WORKING
DIRECTLY WITH INTELLIGENCE
With little abstract
awareness, personality and soul appear as a duality for they comprise not a synthesized
whole but a unified whole. Inclusivity (the soul) is a mediator between synthesis and
exclusivity, so soul and personality together constitute only an illusory duality. Even
unified, the exclusive self remains alive and well, transformed by the imposition of
inclusivity which alters our values and our perspective in a growing sense of planetary
involvement. Remembering that the soul is the first master, and acting as that master, we
consider our responsibility for uplifting the personality which got us to where we stand
today.
One particularly
useful exercise is to consciously call in the angels and integrate any remaining fragments of
personality exclusivity from this or other incarnations, as we magnetically re-polarize
our awareness as the soul. We accept who we are. When the sensations of exclusivity
or impulses to separative thinking are no
longer primary or life-changing motivators, we can safely (mentally) fuse within ourselves exclusive
and inclusive intelligence (mass consciousness and group consciousness).
When this fusion is
sufficiently expressed, we practice universality, seeing Life whole. This marks the end of psychic phenomena, sentimentality, emotionalism,
and other indulgences of separated intelligence.
Not even
bio-neurologists can as yet directly measure human consciousness but they are
getting close. And working with the foibles and limitations of a physical brain
we cannot tell with certainty who is active monadically because no meditative
training or particular religious, philosophical or ideological leanings are
required to transcend time or to fully experience Life Itself.
Teachings or talk about masters,
initiations, love, rays, Shamballa or oneness mean nothing if, by careful
analysis of those words and ideas, separative assumptions (like the divisive
‘we’ who know and ‘they’ who don't) are revealed when evaluating
spiritual leaders or those presenting themselves as ‘highly evolved’ but who
aren't. Those who draw such lines in the dust, perpetuating separation of soul
and personality, lead only the foolish.
In the presence of great
beauty, truth or goodness, with a sufficiently inclusive open-mind, even
the least experienced among us may transcend the sequential awareness of
the soul-infused personality. Those with less understanding are likely to
experience some loss of consciousness during even brief periods of
abstraction, and to return to ordinary awareness with little or no recall
of their mental experience. Beginning meditators often drift into a light
sleep state when working with abstraction or abstract forms or ideas, but experience soon solves the
problem. This was an old practice in certain mystical forms of meditation where
loss of consciousness was considered 'spiritual'. Today, loss of awareness
is considered passé given the sensitivity of the contemporary human
brain. Acute subjective awareness is not only desirable but finally, for
some, possible.
Using the middle principle
of mind, we practice abstract being and direct knowledge by closely
examining and correctly understanding the concepts (with their myriad of
ideas) involved in eternity, wholeness, oneness. Such concepts are
actually mental templates promoting a higher interlude of abstraction in
any scientific form of meditation. From that perspective we should be able
to identify, update and correct any separative concepts, relationships and
attitudes in our own thinking. Later, acting as mediator between
aspects of our own mind during the lower interlude of meditation, we
subjectively readjust or correct the comprehension of our logical mind
(brain consciousness) informing it of our subtle conceptual findings or
abstract recognitions or realizations. Without this step of consciously
informing our lower mind/brain, there will be little or no recoverable
long-term memory.
The same process of enlightenment or mental expansion
can also be obtained in any periodically sustained, abstract contemplation
of the nature of wholeness or life. A recent study (referred to in a
3-part series on the Brain, PBS Morning News, week of 9/16/96) suggests
this latter 'informing' of our memory about our subjective experience is a
normal process, which continues even as we dream40. Higher and lower are symbolic terms, of course,
because nothing is ‘lifted’, nothing is ‘up’ or ‘down’ except our
sensitivity to oneness. We exist within the one mind, not beneath it.
In mastering what
Alice Bailey calls "the most
potent and influential energy in the world, that of the intelligence"41,
we need to understand that the entire path of consciousness constitutes an elaborate,
subjective anatomy lesson. This ongoing, detailed study of the anatomy of the triple
nature of intelligence is incalculably useful in relating and correctly aligning living
facts of life. As suggestible as we all are, it is easy to lose our subjective integrity
in the details of sequential living by forgetting we are and have always been the
conscious soul. As we experiment with teachings on relationships and consciousness, we
should emulate medical students. They do not take to their beds when studying diseases and
(most of the time) lose neither their objectivity nor their physical integrity by
mistaking isolated bits of anatomical information for personal reality. Whether studying,
meditating or serving, we remain complete and moving forward as one soul.
Consider more closely the symbolic imperative of
that esoteric service. To intensify our usefulness once we are comfortably enlightened and
esoterically experienced, we re-examine our service in a higher context. Useful service
activities (service as doing) are based on the inclusive intelligence of the soul, love
and group awareness and they occur in an hierarchical context. Serving as the soul
serves (service as being) is based on the synthetic intelligence of the monad,
oneness or higher will. When, as one, we actively engage our abstract
intelligence, inclusivity falls beneath notice. Service then describes the subconscious
effect of our expressed, synthetic oneness. Naturally, this does not preclude us from
providing useful service activities but we no longer confuse this with our actual service.
As we contribute to planetary awareness of the goal of the wisdom of synthesis, however,
there is pressing need for clearer understanding that:
 |
service is not what we
do but what
we are,
|
 |
the distinctions between becoming and Being are
spiritually critical,
and
|
 |
our acceptance of what we
already know is
sufficient for us
to Be what we already are |
FROM
THEORY TO ACCEPTANCE
Emerging as we are
from centuries of abuse, we tend to overlook the incredible sensitivity or
impressionability of the personality to criticism. Operating in the wholly
constructive mode required for synthesis is not easy but direct efforts to rid
ourselves of limitations tend to be counterproductive. Self-criticism downgrades the
personality and produces a poverty of therapeutic effect42
so no
spiritual gain is occultly accepted. As we do with others, we take care to support any
effort in the direction of inclusiveness. Other than group crises, most personal
crisesobserved in hindsightreveal self-imposed tests within which we draw or
involve others as our agents of karma. Even a self-chosen crisis is difficult
but we quickly resolve most crises by identifying the lesson and changing our own
attitude, not others.
To preemptively use less destructive techniques
than crisis, Patanjali tells us to determine the problem and cultivate its
opposite. Saint Jeanne Françoise de Chantal (a student of Saint Francis de Sales)
says ignore it:
"Do not any longer find cause for trouble in your trouble. Never
speak of it, neither to God nor to yourself, nor ever so much as look at it for long
enough to be able to find words to describe it nor express it to anybody whatever; and
never make it the subject of any examen. Hide your grief from your very self, and hold
your eyes on God as if you did not feel it
".43
Alice Bailey
correctly suggests
problems can only be solved from a higher level. In any event it helps to
recall that "happiness is not the absence of difficulty but the ability to cope with
it".44
Difficulties emerge from the illusions that
dualities create in our thinking because our allegiance to one side or other of any
duality delays wisdom. And the way we resolve dualities depends technically on the type of
intelligence we normally use. If we see dualities as on either hand and ourselves as the
transcending (soul) awareness between them, we are the Observer and using inclusive
intelligence to create a unity, an inclusive resolution. The result is the path. Until we
find the middle ground between opposites (which the Tibetan calls the mentally dynamic
organizing principle of the path) we are not technically on the path. The path
itself is the transcending (abstract) creation of our resolution of duality using
conscious imposition within ourselves of inclusive intelligence (energy) upon exclusive
intelligence (force).
NO TAKING SIDES
Only by becoming the path can we abstractly transform it into the
higher Way. If we fail by exclusively taking the side of white, right and angels, we
effectively exclude ourselves from consciousness as the soul. Simple recognition of any
duality automatically creates an energy triangle because the Observer (the interfacing
Christ principle, the relationship between) is the abstract third point.
Generally speaking, the resolution of any duality, such as black and white, is Light which
abstractly is the Will of the One.
The nature of our perception dictates the nature of
our 'personal' universe: every duality (exclusivity) is esoterically a triangle
(inclusivity), every
triangle is in reality a full circle (synthesis). So if we observe apparent dualities such
as personality and soul from the monadic perspective we see but aspects of a single whole
which are now and always have been one. The full circle. This is strictly a perceptual
matter. Aside from the systemic duality of spirit and matter, we see all dualities as
illusions and stand neither between nor above them. We neither react nor
respond to them.
Abstractly, they are in us, in our
mind, contained within the synthetic perception of the manifesting One. Of strictly human
origin, neither heaven nor hell has the slightest relevance to anything so we give up both
by seeing through them, seeing them whole. Abstractly restored to monadic paradise (the
Persian word for garden), we see but no longer mistake for reality the yin and
yang within the circle of oneness, or misunderstand the (69) as Cancer's symbol of
humanity's physical manifestation. The result is the higher Way of Being.
FINDING OURSELVES
Sufi mystics contend that shoes symbolize the
personality. As an aspirant, removing the shoes for meditation is a symbolic setting aside
of the personality to remind us to work as the soul. A bit trickier for the conscious
disciple who no longer makes that separation is walking humbly with God,
working monadically as the soul on its own plane.
What is certain is that like
the butterfly emerging from the cocoonto be beautiful we have to change.
Change means
correcting and clarifying our understanding of life by experimenting, analyzing and making
mistakes. Failure, like disillusionment, is an important stage in the creative process and to effectively
liberate ourselves we learn both from our own mistakes and from those of others.

Designed to stimulate
personal experience of the Being of oneness, the following
tables comprise an informal checklist in three parts--addressing difficulties and obstacles of each of the three levels of awareness:
Exclusive Intelligence (Intellect)
Inclusive Intelligence (Intuition)
Synthetic Intelligence (Direct Perception)
These
lists are also found at Being-Checklist

Problems
of Exclusive Intelligence (Intellect)
 |
Confusing feelings of
love or affection for
inclusive intelligence.
|
 |
Confusing
emotional feelings of devotion for love.
|
 |
Mistaking feelings of unworthiness as not being
ready for monadic oneness.
|
 |
Perceiving others as mentally separate from
ourselves in terms of intelligence or the one Mind.
|
 |
Belief in individual souls, angels, or
spirit guides.
|
 |
Belief in a
mystical heaven, hell, or paradise.
|
 |
Seeing the soul as an entity,
separate, above or beyond us in terms of time or space.
|
 |
Perceiving the
soul as a channel, or being on the receiving end of such a channel,
effectively separates us from inclusively being that soul.
|
 |
Erroneous impersonality to other people rather
than impersonality to their faults and limitations.
|
 |
Irritation or disappointment with our
own personality
retards progress. All personalities are those proverbial little children we
invite to approach us, so treat them well.
|
 |
Forgetting that negative observations about others
reflect our own shortcomings.
|
 |
Skepticism about
spiritual or intuitional knowledge isolates us from becoming the soul.
|
 |
Unrealistic, exclusive, personalized expectations
about masters delays acceptance of the hierarchical nature of our own consciousness.
|
 |
Belief that redemption or soul infusion lie ahead
creates artificial separation from the soul. We are all human, soul-infused from birth.
|
 |
Separation from the heart/soul by thinking of
ourselves (or others) as personalities prevents compassion, i.e., failure to see that
there but for the grace of God go I.
|
 |
Failure to relinquish the
exclusive sense of individuality
in favor of the sense of unity.
|
 |
Failure to take
that inclusive next step; to think inclusively. |

Problems
of Inclusive
Intelligence (Intuition)
 |
Not recognizing the middle or soul
principle of the mental plane as the true heart center.
|
 |
Not grasping that
our collective inclusive intelligence or consciousness is the soul.
|
 |
Not understanding that the significance of love is
not feeling but thinking inclusively.
|
 |
Failure to progress from ideals about humanity to
inclusive soul love for others.
|
 |
Belief that personality awareness is separate from
soul consciousness.
|
 |
Habitual or devotional aspiration to
soul-consciousness isolates us from becoming the soul; prevents
identification with soul knowledge.
|
 |
Belief that the soul, interfacing
relationship, is separate from higher mind or monad.
|
 |
Too specific identification with any of the seven
rays or seven planes prevents fusion.
|
 |
Literal interpretation of Hierarchy prevents the
abstraction necessary for fusion.
|
 |
Hierarchy is collectively to Humanity what the
soul is individually to the personality.
|
 |
Imagining the masters, Hierarchy or ashrams as up
there or beyond us in either time or space prevents fusion. All are right here,
now.
|
 |
Isolation from
hierarchical
group
consciousness by clinging to the notion of my soul.
|
 |
Suppressing the
intuition by seeing oneself as a
unit of awareness within the one soul rather than as that one soul.
|
 |
Exclusion from group consciousness by rejection
of mass awareness.
|
 |
Working with meaning and
with symbols of relationship
such as masters, hierarchy, initiations, ashrams, triangles, rays,
planes, petals or centers instead of their abstract significance in terms of
oneness.
|
 |
Failure to relinquish the sense of group in favor
of the sense of oneness.
|
 |
Failure to substitute the synthetic
will-to-continue for aspiration.
|
 |
Failure to recognize the monad as the abstract
mind, our collective abstract intelligence.
|
 |
Working with
fusion instead of synthesis, or believing fusion leads to synthesis.
|
 |
Failure to take
that synthetic next step; thinking not of relationships but of
wholes. |

Problems
Grasping Synthetic Intelligence (Direct Perception)
 |
Failure to accept the synthesis of spiritual
ideals.
|
 |
Belief in an individual
abstract mind or personal monad.
|
 |
Mistaking unity for synthesis.
|
 |
Poor imagination in working (playing) with
eternity, with the sense of oneness.
|
 |
Attempting to function as the soul on
its own plane (the monad), as an individual.
|
 |
Unwillingness to
discard concepts and ignore images which
don't reflect oneness.
|
 |
Failing to appreciate,
value, and use spiritual
disillusionment.
|
 |
Fear that synthetic intelligence jeopardizes
self-awareness or promotes uniformity.
|
 |
Not grasping that all progress,
qualities, and processes are
based on sequential soul perception, not oneness.
|
 |
Using group
techniques, acting as if we are the loving soul, slows or stalls
personal acceptance of monadic
reality, of true universality.
|
 |
Belief in the limitations of time and space.
|
 |
Failure to
recognize the antahkarana
bridge of relationship consciousness as sufficiently complete.
|
 |
Literal,
symbolic or pictorial interpretation of shamballic intelligence
prevents understanding and experience of synthesis.
|
 |
Belief that the Path of meaning and the Way of
significance are the same.
|
 |
Belief that
fusion leads to synthesis.
|
 |
Weak or unpracticed extrapolation skills hinder
abstraction.
|
 |
Misguided respect factor prevents
effective Identification by being too polite to presume.
|
 |
Insufficient humor
and irreverence to dispel
obstructing sacred cows or obsolete spiritual ideals, crucial for success.
|
 |
Failure to abstract oneself from the
relating activity of inclusive
intelligence we recognize as the psyche or soul consciousness.
|
 |
Confusing human (planetary)
life and spiritual (solar) life with divine
(solar) Life in terms of our intelligence.
|
 |
Failure to abstract ourselves from
use of both energy and
force by a synthetic sense of oneness.
|
 |
Need for stimulated abstract imagination to see
ourselves and others as a single, eternal, living, synthetic intelligence.
|
 |
Failure to
redefine omniscience, omnipresence, and omnipotence as contemporary,
achievable experience.
|
 |
Failure
abstractly to think 'as One'.
|
 |
Failure to
accomplish a true sense of universality.
|
 |
Failure to accept reality as it is. |

If, through the illusion of our own sense of
isolation, we persist in thinking of ourselves (or others) as persons with
souls, we remain effectively excluded as conscious elements of an externalized
hierarchical interface between Humanity and Shamballa.
As we accept the
practical realities of the nature of our own hierarchical awareness, we no
longer think of Hierarchy as they but as we. We acknowledge
to ourselves an assumed responsibility for the management and future well-being
of all forms of Life as it expresses on this small planet, Earth. Such assumed
responsibility implies an inclusive acceptance of all other human beings and all
other kingdoms.
As tempting as it is, we are no
longer asked to
reveal the nature of soul-infused consciousness. This was revealed by the Christ, and by
all those who preserved the teachings based on the eternal experience of
redemption and salvation. And we are not asked
to reveal the nature of the soul/spirit synthesis of the One Mind, for this was revealed
thoroughly by the Buddha who articulated the nature of the dual mind, and the razor-edged
Way between consciousness and higher Mind.
Today, we are asked to apply the teachings of
both
Christ and Buddha to our own understanding--and then to do more. We are to do what has not yet been done
(except by rare individuals), to accept
the reality of our oneness on the mental plane, the synthetic nature of the One Mind, the wholeness
of soul-infused personality and monad.
As we accept both
our personal and abstract monadic intelligence, we acquire both a sense of
individuality and a sense of universality. Thinking as one, we reveal the simplicity of the
inherent synthetic intelligence of our new human natureour new humanity.
[End of Part 5 of
6]
BEING: BEYOND THE
SOUL
BEING:
|
Contents |
Being-Intro | Part1 |
Part2 | Part3 |
Part4 | Part6 |
top
|
Choices | Liberty
| Lights | Home
|
|
|
|